The Annual Herzlia Conference is always the pinnacle of the conference
season in Israel. This year, it was magnificently organized by IDC at the Dan
Accadiah Hotel in Herzlia. A star-studded cast of international experts cast
their eyes over “Time for New National and Regional Agendas” the topic
of the 2013 event.
This report offers specific references and anonymous remarks
that give the tone to the kaleidoscope of subjects covered by this four day
marathon.
DAY ONE:
IDC Herzlia, together with the Israeli Foreign Office, is
sending five of their Ethiopian students speaking English to South Africa to
counter the “Israel Apartheid Week” events to show South African
students the true face of Israel, which is as far from apartheid as you can
get.
With the upcoming visit to Israel of President Obama, Israel’s
Prime Minister should demand that he should say that the US will stop a nuclear
Iran “even with force” rather than talk of “red lines.” If Iran knew they could destroy Israel
with a nuclear strike they would do so if only to establish their regional
hegemony. Professor Alex Mintz.
Recent research and polls show that Israelis put their trust
in generals and judges and less in their politicians. Professor Gabriel Ben-Dor.
“Frenemies.” A new
word, meaning finding basic points of convergence and common cause with old
enemies. For Israel and much of the Arab world these common threats include
non-state actors, regional instability, and Iran.
In 2013, Israel finds itself more isolated. Significant
processes for Israel includes the rise of political Islam in the Middle East
and Africa. Religious and ethnic groups are fracturing the Middle East and
Africa. The “fertile crescent” has become the destabilized region.
With its internal strife, the loss of tourism, the inability
to export workers abroad to bring back foreign currency, its disrupted gas
supply to Israel, Egypt cannot meet its commitments to the IMF. Added to this
its growing population, Egypt is on its way to bankruptcy.
Even though recent US criticism of Israel was not fair,
Israel must deepen its ties with America for mutual geopolitical strategic
interests. The US has adopted a passive approach to the Middle East as it
shifts its attention to Asia. It has allowed Europe and NATO to take a more
forward role further adding to this pacifism.
The use of force against Iran must remain a credible threat.
Israel is not the only one in the region worried about a nuclear Iran. The
Sunni bloc is gravely concerned.
Europe will continue to be a negative economy for several
years. Britain will not emerge from its slump until at least the end of 2015.
There is a disconnect between the mood and economic reality with the global
equity markets rallying and being overly positive.
If China saves 45 cents on the dollar, and the US saves only
12 cents, don’t be surprised in China accumulates more assets than America.
Europe decided to take diverse countries and make them
converge. They did so without first building the necessary institutions.
Unemployment in Greece and Spain is 26%. In Germany it is only 6%. What do
their finance ministers discuss when they meet? How can they agree to anything
with their differing competitiveness? The dream was not matched by institution
building. If you want to dream you had better wake up.
Developing countries have a growing population. Developed
countries have an aging population. By 2030 there will be an additional 1.5
billion people.
In the US current government spending on social security and
healthcare came to 48%. By 2035 it will reach 63%. How can a country survive
with that scale of expenditure?
A realist is an optimist with experience.
Keynote speaker for Day One was Lt.General Benny Gantz,
Chief of the General Staff of the IDF.
“Lot’s wife was told not to look back, but she did and was
turned into a pillar of salt. You should look back but not get stuck in the
past. You must know what to change. In the 40 years since the Yom Kippur War it
has not been quiet here. If there is one constant it is there is no constant.
We must be alert to this constant instability.
Once we were at war with Syria. Today, the Syrian army is
attacking its own people. Terror organizations are taking a foothold against
Assad. Guess what? We are next in line. I don’t know what the fate of the
Syrian army will be. All I know is that the Golan Heights are not the same
place.
I was the last soldier to leave Lebanon in 2000. Today, tens
of thousands of missiles are under urban cover. The instability there has
changed to a sort of pseudo-stability under Hezbollah, but what is happening at
nine in the morning can change by four in the afternoon. There is a fuse that
can go off instantly. We are prepared and we know how to act if necessary.
Sinai is no longer the place to go to for hikes and the
beach. It is a terrorist hotbed. We hope that quiet will be maintained but it
is an area in flux.
In Gaza we have to differentiate between inflammatory
rhetoric and action. Operation Pillar of Defense reimposed deterrence. In Judea & Samaria, the Shabak and the IDF
are working night and day to do what is needed to maintain quiet. Iran is on my
mind daily.
We face multiple challenges. The chances of war are low but deterioration
is possible. There have been changes in the characteristics of the fighting. We
are talking about the changes in the range of enemy fire. We don’t have the privilege
of the army and the civilians operating separately, not on our side and not in
dealing with the enemy. An evasive enemy dissolves among the civilian
population. The threats never disappeared. They just changed their form.
We have a moral imperative to protect our citizens. We need
to develop intelligence to operate our forces, to assess incoming intelligence
and convert it into the right attack capability in a very precise fashion. In a
future conflict we will need a physical presence on the ground. Our soldiers
may need to go into villages, to go and fight underground, into tunnels, to
meet the enemy.
We have the awareness of everything that goes cyber. It saves
lives and prevents infrastructure damage. These aren’t video games. They are an
existential threat to Israel.
We must not have a hollow army. It may be smaller but solid.
A faster, more lethal, better trained and equipped army. The IDF is a strong
army with a glorious history, a capability based on that strength. We are not a
capital venture fund. This reform must be done cautiously with preparedness. We
could be at war tomorrow.
We cannot rest on our laurels. If we do the future will take
its revenge on us.
The discussion of who serves, how many and where, are
important for Israeli society. The IDF belongs to the people. Paramount
importance is bearing the burden, the right ot serve the country. This should
be seen as a privilege.
Napoleon said that he needed generals with luck. We must be
prepared so that when the time comes we are lucky."
No comments:
Post a Comment